Hi Mukesh,
Regarding your query below is the suggestion
1. FRS system needs to be on SERVER-A
2. DS/IS needs to be on SERVER-B and SERVER-C.
3. If Server-B is down, user can move/work to/from SERVER-C and vice versa.
Reply:-
FRS is used for Information steward only so my suggestion is in all node keep services identical if you are planning to use load-balancing in terms of Active & Passive node.
Option I:-
Server A- Total 6 Services (Including Information Steward + BOE/BOIPS + DS)
Server B- Total 6 Services (Including Information Steward + BOE/BOIPS + DS)
Server C- Total 6 Services (Including Information Steward + BOE/BOIPS + DS)
In Option I you will never face performance issue if you are sizing is done properly.
Services are:- CMS, Input, Out, Adaptive Job Server, EIM Adaptive processing Server & Information Steward processing Server.
Option II:-
Server A- Total 1 Services (Excluding Information Steward & Data Services), Only Input & output FRS
Server B- Total 4 Services (Excluding Information Steward). All Services
Server C- Total 1 Services (Including Information Steward), Only Information Steward
In Option II you will face performance issue as well as when it fail over or server is crashed then you have to create those additional services in other servers.
Option III:-
Server A- Total 4 Services (BOE/BOIPS)
Server B- Total 1 Services (DS)
Server C- Total 1 Services (Information Steward)
In Option III you will never face performance issue as well as when if SERVER A is crashed then cannot login in BODS Client or Data Services management console, So please review all points of each option.
Note: - Also check with respect to Access Server & Job Server fail over in each scenario, you have to consider this point also.
Hope this will help you as well.
Thanks,
Daya